On 10/14/25 16:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:49 PM Hector Cao <[email protected]> wrote:
Reverting the two faulty commits in 10.0.x will reduce the scope of migration
failures (10.0.x -> 10.0.y / 10.1.z)
Yes, I agree. In my opinion reverting is the best option, because it
makes the machine types as constant as possible. Any change in the
machine types is a bug and the fix is to revert to the previous
situation.
Ok, let's just revert them, despite the fact it's been two stable
10.0.x releases already.
How exactly migration fails, when it fails, and what's our
breakage matrix?
<=10.0.3
10.0.4,10.0.5
>=10.0.6 with reverts (I plan to make this release ASAP)
I guess migration between <=10.0.3 and >=10.0.6 will be just fine.
also, it looks like 10.1.2 should be released ASAP too, with the fixes
on top picked up from the master branch.
Let's plan two new stable releases (10.0.6 & 10.1.2) for the next week.
Thanks,
/mjt
