Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> writes: > Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Wanpeng Li <liw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> >>> [CCing ML] >>> >>> From: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> >>> >>> The HPET usually sits on the LPC bus (which replaces ISA in modern systems). >>> It's sometimes a dedicated chip but can certain co-exist in a Super IO chip. >>> I think in terms of where it would live in this hypothetical device model, >>> putting it in the PIIX is rational. >> >> Could you explain briefly why you have to move struct definitions from >> .c to .h? > > This patch shouldn't be in this series. The reason to do this is so > that the PIIX3 can do composition and have the HPET/PIT as child > devices. But that isn't in this series so having this patch isn't > useful.
Let's drop it then for now.
