On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300 Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500 > anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward > > with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This > > note attempts to outline that. > > This looks great to me, violent^W heated discussions can be so productive :) > > > > > Principles > > ---------- > > 1. Errors should be free formed strings with a class code > > > > 2. There should be a small number of class codes (10-15) added > > strictly when there are specific users of a code. Btw, do we have a listing of those 10-15 errors already?
