Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300 > Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500 >> anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward >> > with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This >> > note attempts to outline that. >> >> This looks great to me, violent^W heated discussions can be so productive :) >> >> > >> > Principles >> > ---------- >> > 1. Errors should be free formed strings with a class code >> > >> > 2. There should be a small number of class codes (10-15) added >> > strictly when there are specific users of a code. > > Btw, do we have a listing of those 10-15 errors already?
See the clause: "added strictly when there are specific users". Users means consumers. So don't add an error type until someone cares to differientiate error reasons. Regards, Anthony Liguori
