On 2012-09-03 17:52, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 06:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/03/2012 11:40 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>> Am 03.09.2012 04:56, schrieb Matthew Ogilvie:
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/i8259_common.c b/hw/i8259_common.c
>>>>> index ab3d98b..dcde5f2 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/i8259_common.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/i8259_common.c
>>>> [...]
>>>>> @@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pic_common = {
>>>>> VMSTATE_UINT8(isr, PICCommonState),
>>>>> VMSTATE_UINT8(priority_add, PICCommonState),
>>>>> VMSTATE_UINT8(irq_base, PICCommonState),
>>>>> + VMSTATE_UINT8(icw3, PICCommonState),
>>>>> VMSTATE_UINT8(read_reg_select, PICCommonState),
>>>>> VMSTATE_UINT8(poll, PICCommonState),
>>>>> VMSTATE_UINT8(special_mask, PICCommonState),
>>>>
>>>> Additional VMState needs to be versioned by incrementing .version_id and
>>>> by specifying the new version number here. Otherwise it breaks migration.
>>
>> For the subsection, only sending this when icw3 != 0 is enough? I am
>> searching for a test about when we need to send it.
>
> Looks like the optimal condition is ((s->icw3 & ~s->eclr) != 0) (i.e.
> bit set in icw3 but clear in eclr).
The standard PC values are optimal: 4 for master, 2 for slave.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
