On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/03/2012 10:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 08/29/2012 11:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't see a point in making contributors avoid non-problems that might >>>> conceivably become trivial problems some day. Especially when there's >>>> no automated help with the avoiding. >>> >>> -Wpointer-arith >> >> +1 > > FWIW, I'm not in favour of enabling it, just pointing out that it > exists. In general I prefer avoiding unnecessary use of extensions, but > in this case the extension is trivial and improves readability.
Void pointers are not so type safe as uint8_t pointers. There's also little difference in readability between those in my opinion. > > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
