On 4 October 2012 11:15, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/04/2012 10:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> I'd favour just moving everything to 64 bits (the remaining >> 32 bit targets are: cris, lm32, m68k, microblaze, or32, sh4, unicore32, >> xtensa). However it does require some review of devices to check that >> they're not using target_phys_addr_t when they meant uint32_t [eg >> in registers for DMA devices] or relying on 32 bit wraparound. > > I posted a patch. I did no review, the cost/benefit tradeoff is > horrible IMO, especially with me not knowing the details. If something > breaks, git bisect will save the day.
It might be nice to cc the maintainers of the affected target archs and suggest that they at least do a quick smoke test :-) -- PMM
