On 05.01.2013, at 01:35, Samuel Seay wrote: > Peter Maydell recommended the change to be more proper. The result was tested > and shows coming up with the same proper value. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Seay <lightnin...@gmail.com>
Thanks, applied to ppc-next with a modified subject line. Please take a few minutes and read through patch subjects and patch descriptions of other people's patches (just run git log) to get a hang for what exactly would be useful to have in there and what wouldn't. Alex > --- > linux-user/signal.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c > index c43b8ac..bb08a93 100644 > --- a/linux-user/signal.c > +++ b/linux-user/signal.c > @@ -4614,7 +4614,7 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct > target_sigaction *ka, > /* Set up registers for signal handler. */ > env->gpr[1] = newsp; > env->gpr[3] = signal; > - env->gpr[4] = (target_ulong) h2g(sc); > + env->gpr[4] = frame_addr + offsetof(struct target_sigframe, sctx); > env->nip = (target_ulong) ka->_sa_handler; > /* Signal handlers are entered in big-endian mode. */ > env->msr &= ~MSR_LE; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > >
