>> ## +# @ChardevFile: > > Should you mention '@in: #optional' and '@out:' in any further > detail?
Done. > Hmm; here you document ChardevFile as a separate type, but you > didn't document ChardevDummy in patch 4/10. As the name says it is just a dummy passed when the backend in question doesn't need any parameters. Therefore it is empty. Does it really need its own documentation stanza? cheers, Gerd