>> ## +# @ChardevFile:
> 
> Should you mention '@in: #optional' and '@out:' in any further
> detail?

Done.

> Hmm; here you document ChardevFile as a separate type, but you
> didn't document ChardevDummy in patch 4/10.

As the name says it is just a dummy passed when the backend in
question doesn't need any parameters.  Therefore it is empty.  Does it
really need its own documentation stanza?

cheers,
  Gerd


Reply via email to