On 27 January 2013 16:30, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > In the initial conversion of CPU models to QOM types, model names were > mapped 1:1 to type names. As a side effect this gained us a type "any", > which is now a device. > > To avoid "-device any" silliness and to pave the way for compiling > multiple targets into one executable, adopt a <name>-<arch>-cpu scheme. > This leads to names like arm926-arm-cpu but is easiest to handle. > > No functional changes for -cpu arguments or -cpu ? output. > > Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> I assume you're going to submit this via the qom subtree. -- PMM
