Il 18/03/2013 19:11, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > > So what is the better alternative? A new hw/container/? > > Maybe. Whatever it is, it should be a classification by kind > of device, so we can consistently sort by kind of device > and not part by kind of device and part by target architecture. > > Personally I have no issues with the existing 'all in hw/' > arrangement; I just want you to come up with a consistent > structure if you're going to try to change it.
Shouldn't these containers also host the CPU device(s), rather than the boards? And create them according to the num-cpu property? If so, they would have to go in hw/arm. Andreas, what do you think? Paolo
