On 18 March 2013 20:05, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 18/03/2013 19:17, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >>> > Shouldn't these containers also host the CPU device(s), rather than the >>> > boards? And create them according to the num-cpu property? If so, they >>> > would have to go in hw/arm. >> Yes, ideally they should have the CPU devices in them too. >> Remind me why devices which instantiate the CPU device go >> in hw/arm ? > > Because they refer to ARMCPU/CPUARMState.
Well, a container object that instantiated the CPUs wouldn't be referring to the internal CPU state struct, it would just be treating them as QOM objects like any other, so that doesn't apply. -- PMM
