On 03/28/2013 09:09 AM, Laurent Desnogues wrote: >> I think it actually makes everything a lot cleaner myself. Especially given >> the previous definition that required runtime checks for TST et al. > > I also find this cleaner. OTOH I understand that Peter finds it > odd given that other operations (such as ADD) can optionally > set flags.
Well of course they can. Which is exactly why I'm doing all this, because I can include that bit in the add2/sub2 expansion below. It's just that the comparison insns *require* the S bit set, which is what is going on in this enum. r~
