On 7 May 2013 17:08, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Da: "Peter Maydell" <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >> Why is the limit we're asserting not the same as the maximum >> size that we pass to g_renew() below? > > That's a minimum size, isn't it?
Doh, so it is. > I'm asserting that the physical section number doesn't overflow into > the page, since the TLB entries are stored as a combination of the two. Maybe this could use a comment about where (in what data structure) the section number lives, because it's not entirely obvious (well, to me anyway). -- PMM
