Il 29/05/2013 19:04, Edgar E. Iglesias ha scritto:
>> > + for (i = 0; i < R_MAX; ++i) {
>> > + RegisterInfo *r = &s->regs_info[i];
>> > +
>> > + *r = (RegisterInfo) {
>> > + .data = &s->regs[i],
>> > + .data_size = sizeof(uint32_t),
>> > + .access = &xilinx_devcfg_regs_info[i],
>> > + .debug = XILINX_DEVCFG_ERR_DEBUG,
>> > + .prefix = prefix,
>> > + .opaque = s,
>> > + };
>> > + memory_region_init_io(&r->mem, &devcfg_reg_ops, r, "devcfg-regs",
>> > 4);
> Hi Peter, Should we be putting r->access->name here instead of "devcfg-regs"?
Yes, that's why I preferred to wrap the memory_region_init_io into an
API that takes a RegisterInfo. :)
Paolo
