On 14.06.2013, at 13:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:

> This is on top of "[PATCH v3 00/16] -boot and -no-fd-bootchk fixes",
> so it's protected by the tests there.
> 
> The first five patches are admittedly related to the stated purpose of
> this series pretty much only by "I can't stand perpetuating this
> stupid crap".  Max Filippov and Peter Maydell already cleaned up
> Xtensa and ARM the same way.

PPC patches are:

  Acked-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>

As for the functional change of defaulting boot_order to NULL on most boards, 
I'm reasonably indifferent. I suppose the purpose of the rename was to detect 
all cases where it gets used, so it _should_ be safe to default to NULL.


Alex


Reply via email to