Il 02/07/2013 11:31, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: > On 2013-07-02 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 02/07/2013 10:36, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: >>>>>>> Hmm, two solutions for one problem - can we improve this in the next >>>>>>> round? >>>>> >>>>> Sure, I can adapt the hw/acpi/piix4.c to use ifs in the same style as >>>>> hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c (I find the code easier to read). >>> I was more referring to memory_region_present vs. open-coding. >> >> Understood, but once you replace ?: with "if", the memory_region_present >> wrapper loses most of the appeal. So I actually prefer the open-coded one. > > Well, count the memory_region_unref calls.
Fair enough... I'll move memory_region_present to memory.h/c. Paolo