On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:15:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 15/07/2013 18:52, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> writes: > > > >> The following changes since commit > >> c3cb8e77804313e1be99b5f28a34a346736707a5: > >> > >> ioport: remove LITTLE_ENDIAN mark for portio (2013-07-12 14:37:47 -0500) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-ccw-upstr > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to bf72d89f0a8fb27a6bfde1a689690fd577227762: > >> > >> virtio-ccw: Enable x-data-plane for virtio-ccw-blk (2013-07-15 > >> 17:39:04 +0200) > > > > This is v1? This was just posted on Thursday? That's a bit too quick > > for a pull request. > > > > I've seen no review from Stefan or Paolo and I would think that given > > the work that's been done already, it would be counterproductive to > > enable x-data-plane for another backend. > > > > Paolo/Stefan, what do you guys think? > > Considering what the patch looks like, I don't think it's a huge > problem... In fact, perhaps x-data-plane could be even added to > DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_PROPERTIES. This would make it clear that support for > non-ioeventfd hosts (including TCG) is one of the things to do to make > data plane the default.
I agree. Since this patch is so minimal it will not add extra work as we reintegrate dataplane into core QEMU. Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>