On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:15:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 15/07/2013 18:52, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> writes:
> > 
> >> The following changes since commit 
> >> c3cb8e77804313e1be99b5f28a34a346736707a5:
> >>
> >>   ioport: remove LITTLE_ENDIAN mark for portio (2013-07-12 14:37:47 -0500)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >>   git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-ccw-upstr
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to bf72d89f0a8fb27a6bfde1a689690fd577227762:
> >>
> >>   virtio-ccw: Enable x-data-plane for virtio-ccw-blk (2013-07-15
> >>   17:39:04 +0200)
> > 
> > This is v1?  This was just posted on Thursday?  That's a bit too quick
> > for a pull request.
> > 
> > I've seen no review from Stefan or Paolo and I would think that given
> > the work that's been done already, it would be counterproductive to
> > enable x-data-plane for another backend.
> > 
> > Paolo/Stefan, what do you guys think?
> 
> Considering what the patch looks like, I don't think it's a huge
> problem...  In fact, perhaps x-data-plane could be even added to
> DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_PROPERTIES.  This would make it clear that support for
> non-ioeventfd hosts (including TCG) is one of the things to do to make
> data plane the default.

I agree.  Since this patch is so minimal it will not add extra work as
we reintegrate dataplane into core QEMU.

Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to