Kevin Wolf schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> as Steve suggests, I'm forwarding the list of issues he found to the
> mailing list. I've already looked at a few points in the block code and
> sent patches. If everyone picks up one point, we should get through the
> list quickly. Who volunteers for the TCG ones? ;-)
>
> Kevin
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff: [virt-devel] qemu code review
> Datum: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:05:33 -0500
> Von: Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> I took a few hours to run qemu through an analysis tool. Below are the
> results
> of checking everything. I don't interact with the qemu community and
> thought
> someone here might want to take these finding upstream. The review was
> against
> 0.11.0-11 in rawhide.
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
> -----------------------------
>
> ...
> In hw/e1000.c at line 89, vlan is declared to be 4 bytes. At line 382 is an
> attempt to do a memmove over it with a size of 12.
>
Obviously this was intentional. Would replacing
memmove(tp->vlan, tp->data, 12);
by
memmove(tp->data - 4, tp->data, 12);
be better and satisfy the analysis tool? Or even better
(hopefully the compiler will combine both statements)
memmove(tp->vlan, tp->data, 4);
memmove(tp->data, tp->data + 4, 8);
> In hw/sb16.c at line 898 is an "if" statement with 0 and'ed. If this was
> intentional, there should be a comment or the code in the if statement
> deleted.
>
> ...
