On 2 September 2013 16:53, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 2 September 2013 16:42, Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Question, why are not pci_address_space and pci_hole present
>> in a core layer?
>>
>> I followed the existing code; from what you are saying
>> I understand that also the existing memory regions
>> like the one mentioned above should be moved in
>> the core layer, right?
>
> Ideally, yes, I think so.

...but I didn't notice you mentioned pci_hole there. That
is a PCI-controller specific concept (there's no such thing
for the versatilepb PCI controller, for instance) and so it
should remain at the PCI controller level, not the PCI
core code.

-- PMM

Reply via email to