On 2 September 2013 16:53, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 2 September 2013 16:42, Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Question, why are not pci_address_space and pci_hole present >> in a core layer? >> >> I followed the existing code; from what you are saying >> I understand that also the existing memory regions >> like the one mentioned above should be moved in >> the core layer, right? > > Ideally, yes, I think so.
...but I didn't notice you mentioned pci_hole there. That is a PCI-controller specific concept (there's no such thing for the versatilepb PCI controller, for instance) and so it should remain at the PCI controller level, not the PCI core code. -- PMM