If the filename is not prefixed by "blkverify:" in
blkverify_parse_filename(), the blkverify driver was not selected
through that protocol prefix, but by an explicit command line (or QMP)
option (like driver=blkverify). Contrary to the current reaction, this
is no longer a problem; both images may be specified through the "test"
and "raw" options, respectively.
If a filename has been given, pass it as the test image filename.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
---
block/blkverify.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blkverify.c b/block/blkverify.c
index 8bf81b5..a903680 100644
--- a/block/blkverify.c
+++ b/block/blkverify.c
@@ -78,7 +78,11 @@ static void blkverify_parse_filename(const char *filename,
QDict *options,
/* Parse the blkverify: prefix */
if (!strstart(filename, "blkverify:", &filename)) {
- error_setg(errp, "File name string must start with 'blkverify:'");
+ /* There was no prefix; therefore, all options have to be already
+ present in the QDict; if a filename is given, pass it */
+ if (filename) {
+ qdict_put(options, "x-image", qstring_from_str(filename));
+ }
return;
}
--
1.8.5.1
