On 12.12.2013 11:41, Fam Zheng wrote:
On 2013年12月12日 02:11, Max Reitz wrote:
Add a test for the new blkdebug/blkverify interface.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/071 | 201
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/071.out | 73 ++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 275 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/071
create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/071.out
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/071 b/tests/qemu-iotests/071
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..4be525e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/071
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+#!/bin/bash
Is is intended to use hand coded json instead of iotests.py for QMP
test here?
I first tried to use Python, but I hit problems with
human-monitor-command and qemu-io. qemu-io prints errors to stderr,
therefore they are not returned via QMP. iotests.py discards stderr,
therefore there was no way to actually check for the qemu-io return status.
I could have added a function to iotests.py, but then I would have to
manually compare and filter the qemu-io output with a reference. All
these functions are already there for shell script tests.
I guess I should add this explanation to the commit message, though…
Max
