On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:24:38 +0300 (MSK) > malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:03:33 +0300 (MSK) > > > malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:57:48 -0600 > > > > > Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > > > > > > > > > [..snip..] > > > > > > > > > > > > > [..snip..] > > > > > > > > > > Any particular reason for implementing audio as a driver instead > > > > of a capture? > > > > > > > > > Spice doesnt have paravirtual audio driver, it use the AC97 device. > > > > Yes it has - interface_audio_driver in audio/vd_interface_audio.c > > > > I think the file name here is missleading you...
I think you just don't understand what i'm asking. Let me try to expand: one way to implement audio interception is by having a special audio_driver (wavaudio.c vd_interface_audio.c) the other is by using a capture interface atop of existing driver (wavcapture.c vnc.c) I was curious as to why the former was chosen. -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
