On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:53:25 +0300 (MSK) malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:24:38 +0300 (MSK) > > malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:03:33 +0300 (MSK) > > > > malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:57:48 -0600 > > > > > > Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > [..snip..] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [..snip..] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any particular reason for implementing audio as a driver > > > > > instead of a capture? > > > > > > > > > > > > Spice doesnt have paravirtual audio driver, it use the AC97 > > > > device. > > > > > > Yes it has - interface_audio_driver in audio/vd_interface_audio.c > > > > > > > I think the file name here is missleading you... > > I think you just don't understand what i'm asking. Let me try to > expand: one way to implement audio interception is by having a special > audio_driver (wavaudio.c vd_interface_audio.c) the other is by using > a capture interface atop of existing driver (wavcapture.c vnc.c) > > I was curious as to why the former was chosen. > I see what you mean, I didnt write this part, so i will have to ask who wrote it and will come back to you with an answer why he did it like that. Thanks.
