On 2/5/2014 3:48 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > Does this work? After this val contains reserve_val2, but further down that > one gets checked against reserve_val so the comparison is broken, no?
Yes. I believe you are correct. Thanks, Alex.
On 2/5/2014 3:48 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > Does this work? After this val contains reserve_val2, but further down that > one gets checked against reserve_val so the comparison is broken, no?
Yes. I believe you are correct. Thanks, Alex.