On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 27/02/2014 15:39, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: > >> > > >> > Each of them highlights one of the two aspects that, in my opinion, make > >> > QOM interesting (respectively, unification of interfaces and the > >> > containment tree). > > I was planning to tackle the replacement of the machine from a container > > to an actual object too, however this patch conflicts with my > > series because I already have a QOM Machine object created *always* > > and this patch adds another object *sometimes*. > > > > Is this patch's functionality in use yet? Any idea how to merge those ideas? > > pseries simply wants to make /machine implement the FWPathProvider > interface. As long as you have a way for boards to specify a TypeInfo > for /machine, this patch will not get in the way. Thanks Paolo! I'll be aware not to brake this functionality. Marcel
> > Paolo
