Il 11/04/2014 05:14, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> > > How about simply looking for a hotplug handler type device instead?
> > > We aren't likely to have many of these, are we?
> >
> > How about adding link<acpi_device> to PCMachine when it's created
> > and use it instead of piix4_pm_find()/ich9_lpc_find() everywhere?
> > that would allow to remove above searches in QOM tree and simplify
> > code including acpi-build.c
>
> So each acpi implementation registers a link at a pre-defined path?
That's a nice solution. (It would be a link<HotplugHandler>, right?)
Paolo
> I'm fine with this, need an ack from afaerber though.
It could be a just plain pointer since it points to system device which
won't disappear suddenly (i.e. it's not hot-unplugable).
