On 06/04/2014 06:54 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On 06/04/2014 04:16 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Call g_free() after cache_fini() in migration_end(), but do not call
>>>> g_free() after call cache_fini() in xbzrle_cache_resize() which will
>>>> cause memory leak.
>>>>
>>>> cache_init() and cache_fini() are pair, so need let cache_fini() call
>>>> g_free(cache) to match cache_init(), then fix current issue too.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I get you.  Is the following accurate?
>>>
>>>     migration: Plug memory leak in migrate-set-cache-size command
>>>
>>>     We call g_free() after cache_fini() in migration_end(), but we don't
>>>     call it after cache_fini() in xbzrle_cache_resize(), leaking the
>>>     memory.
>>>
>>>     cache_init() and cache_fini() are a pair.  Since cache_init()
>>>     allocates the cache, let cache_fini() free it.  This plugs the leak.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, and excuse me for my poor English.
> 
> No problem, we figured it out together :)
> 
> Would be nice to use the above text as commit message.  Perhaps it can
> be done on commit.
> 

That is fine to me.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed

Reply via email to