On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:36:17PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/09/2014 08:29 PM, Hu Tao wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:02:51PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >> On 06/09/2014 04:25 AM, Hu Tao wrote: > >>> From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com> > >>> > >>> If the total number of the assigned numa nodes memory is not > >>> equal to the assigned ram size, it will write the wrong data > >>> to ACPI table, then the guest will ignore the wrong ACPI table > >>> and recognize all memory to one node. It's buggy, we should > >>> check it to ensure that we write the right data to ACPI table. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > >>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > >>> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hu...@cn.fujitsu.com> > >>> --- > >>> numa.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > >>> > >> > >>> + if (numa_total != ram_size) { > >>> + error_report("qemu: total memory size for NUMA nodes (%" > >>> PRIu64 ")" > >>> + " should equal to RAM size (" RAM_ADDR_FMT > >>> ")\n", > >> > >> error_report() should not include trailing \n > > > > Thanks. > > Sorry for not noticing earlier, but a couple more things to fix: > > error_report already prefixes the error message, so s/qemu: // > > The grammar is a bit awkward; how about: > > "total memory for NUMA nodes (%" PRIu64 ") should equal RAM size (" > RAM_ADDR_FMT ")"
MST's already said equal RAM size. I looked up in a dictionary and found a `equal to' example. But I was still wrong that `euqal to' is adj. form, if it is used as verb there is no following `to'. Thanks. Hu