On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:29:14PM +0800, zhanghailiang wrote: > In function virtio_blk_handle_request, it may freed memory pointed by req, > So do not access member of req after calling this function. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> Stefan want to pick up this one? > --- > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > index c241c50..54a853a 100644 > --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_output(VirtIODevice *vdev, > VirtQueue *vq) > static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) > { > VirtIOBlock *s = opaque; > - VirtIOBlockReq *req = s->rq; > + VirtIOBlockReq *req = s->rq, *next = NULL; > MultiReqBuffer mrb = { > .num_writes = 0, > }; > @@ -469,8 +469,9 @@ static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) > s->rq = NULL; > > while (req) { > + next = req->next; > virtio_blk_handle_request(req, &mrb); > - req = req->next; > + req = next; > } > > virtio_submit_multiwrite(s->bs, &mrb); > -- > 1.7.12.4 >