14.08.2014 11:29, zhanghailiang wrote: > In function virtio_blk_handle_request, it may freed memory pointed by req, > So do not access member of req after calling this function. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com> > --- > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > index c241c50..54a853a 100644 > --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_output(VirtIODevice *vdev, > VirtQueue *vq) > static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) > { > VirtIOBlock *s = opaque; > - VirtIOBlockReq *req = s->rq; > + VirtIOBlockReq *req = s->rq, *next = NULL; > MultiReqBuffer mrb = { > .num_writes = 0, > }; > @@ -469,8 +469,9 @@ static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) > s->rq = NULL; > > while (req) { > + next = req->next; > virtio_blk_handle_request(req, &mrb); > - req = req->next; > + req = next; > } > > virtio_submit_multiwrite(s->bs, &mrb);
So, finally, I've applied this patch: --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c @@ -469,8 +469,9 @@ static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) s->rq = NULL; while (req) { + VirtIOBlockReq *next = req->next; virtio_blk_handle_request(req, &mrb); - req = req->next; + req = next; } virtio_submit_multiwrite(s->bs, &mrb); and dropped Stefan's Reviewed-by on the way ;) This is a bugfix after all ;) Thanks, /mjt