Il 28/08/2014 16:27, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto: > Yeh, so a solution to that was to patch qom to drop the [*] for > singletons added via arrayified property adders. One possible semantic > that I can think of is the 0th element always has a property alias so > that foo and foo[0] mean the same thing. This tricky part is, when > "[1]" comes along the preferred name (the canonical path) for the 0th > element should switch from "foo" to "foo[0]". Is it sane to switch > child and alias strings for "[0]" when "[1]" comes along?
You and I both know that the right solution is to move the [*] from memory.c to the callers... :) Paolo
