It is not for fixing bugs. I guess it belongs to trivial patch (not fix bugs, not changing any working flow).
And excuse me, gmail is broken again, in China, I have to reply on web site via my Mac book Safari (which is not a pure text). On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 19 January 2015 at 15:34, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For tcg_target_ulong (include TCGArg), it often uses lower 32-bit mask > > and higher 32-bit mask, so define the related macro for it, so can let > > code simpler, and avoid various coding styles for them. > > > > - For lower, some append 'u', some append 'U', and some no 'u' or 'U'. > > > > - For higher, some append 'ull', some use type cast. > > > > - For lower but may be used higher bits, append 'ull'. > > Is this patch fixing any actual bugs? I think code-style-wise > I prefer what we have at the moment... > > -- PMM > -- Chen Gang
