On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Leon Alrae wrote: > > And do we want to have CP0C3_LPA set in the few templates that do in the > > first place? AFAICT we don't really implement LPA so this bit will > > confuse software. Of course implementing it would be another option, not > > very complicated AFAICS, and if we can track the requirement to update > > MFC0 at that time, then the clean-up I mentioned above can be deferred > > until then. > > In general I don't think it's a good idea to indicate presence of a > feature in a CPU config if it isn't implemented at all in QEMU -- as you > said, it will confuse software. As far as LPA goes I've got already an > implementation of it (and XPA as well) which I haven't submitted > upstream yet. I'll make sure it contains the change you suggested.
Great, I'll leave it to you to sort out then. Thanks! Maciej
