On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > 3. As the BDS that owns the job > > > > > > My question is whether we can't simply call stream_start() > > > with an intermediate node as bs instead of introducing a new > > > parameter. I'm not completely sure about the consequences of > > > 3., i.e. moving ownership of a block job to some BDS somewhere > > > down the chain, but otherwise it should be possible and seems > > > cleaner. > > > > Since I was also not sure about the consequences of such a change > > I opted for the conservative approach. > > I see. I'm worried about the external API. If we let the root node > own the job, we may paint ourselves into a corner with respect to > nodes with multiple users and therefore multiple possible root > nodes.
I'll try to move the job to the intermediate node and see where I can get then. Berto
