On 03/17/2015 12:28 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > Yes, but shouldn't be there a difference between rawhide (e.g. 2.3-rc0) > and fedora virt preview library (e.g. currently 2.2.1)? > Or is rawhide everything and fedora-virt-preview.repo only the virt part > of rawhide? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository > http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-virt-preview.repo
fedora-virt-preview aims to ship in Fedora N what you would otherwise have to use Fedora N+1 for, limiting to just virtualization packages. So if rawhide (F23) is shipping qemu 2.2.1, then fedora-virt-preview for F22 will also ship qemu 2.2.1. > > Nevertheless I don't see any advantages releasing RC production quality > to the rawhide repository as we expect the release soon. I see tremendous benefit to putting the RC candidate in rawhide - that much extra testing to make sure the final release is not going to cause unexpected regressions. > > As my question regarding "support" for virt preview was not answered > when I had problems and tried it I think I'll switch back to Fedora > supported repos. This list isn't the primary list for fedora-virt-preview questions; it's not that the product is unsupported, but that the support is better found on the correct list. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
