On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> you are extending structure beyond of what specified by ACPI 1.0b spec, > that might break guests. > We probably can't change revision since Windows ACPI implementation > is mostly 1.0b based so we are stuck with it. > Patch needs to be tested with Windows guests starting with XP. > Works fine with XP as long as you don't use q35, but i guess that's unsupported by xp by default. > related issue, > adding fields without changing major version to a corresponding > one doesn't look correct. > What do you suggest? saying we support 2.0a just because of introducing reset_reg is not really valid is it?
