On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/04/2015 08:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > So you are suggesting each device add it's own SSDT? I'm not sure how > >> > that helps debugging, it seems simpler to add it to a common one. > > For example, it's easier to write a unit test: encode something specific > > in one of the IDs, then look it up. > > Which is, btw, something that's missing in this patchset. > > A unit test for what? > > Paolo
The ACPI code added. With an extra table it would be easy to test that it's there. -- MST
