Le 12/08/2015 01:13, Richard Henderson a écrit : > On 08/09/2015 01:13 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> INSN(undef, 0000, 0000, CF_ISA_A); >> + INSN(undef, 0000, 0000, M68000); >> INSN(arith_im, 0080, fff8, CF_ISA_A); >> + INSN(arith_im, 0000, ff00, M68000); >> + INSN(undef, 00c0, ffc0, M68000); >> INSN(bitrev, 00c0, fff8, CF_ISA_APLUSC); >> INSN(bitop_reg, 0100, f1c0, CF_ISA_A); >> + INSN(bitop_reg, 0100, f1c0, M68000); >> INSN(bitop_reg, 0140, f1c0, CF_ISA_A); >> + INSN(bitop_reg, 0140, f1c0, M68000); > > There's a *lot* of repetition in here. > > Can we also introduce a BASE() macro that's like INSN() except that it doesn't > bother checking m68k_feature? That way if both CF_ISA_A and M68000 are set, > we > don't have to duplicate the entry.
Thank you, good idea. Laurent
