On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> writes:
>
>> On 08/09/2015 01:13 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> + opsize = (insn & 0x40) != 0 ? OS_LONG : OS_WORD;
>>> + incr = opsize_bytes(opsize);
>>> + if (!is_load && (insn & 070) == 040) {
>>> + for (i = 15; i >= 0; i--, mask >>= 1) {
>>
>> This has got to be wrong. Just because it's pre-decrement doesn't mean
>> you should skip all of the loads.
>
> Pre-dec only supports reg-to-mem, and is special because mask is bit
> reversed.
Ah, I'd never noticed that. A comment to that effect would be good.
r~
