On Thu, 09/10 21:23, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > Return false from can_receive() when the FIFO doesn't have a free RX > slot. This fixes a bug in the current code where the allocated buffer > is freed before the fifo pop, triggering a premature flush of queued RX > packets. It also will handle a corner case, where the guest manually > frees the allocated buffer before popping the rx FIFO (hence it is not > enough to just delay the flush_queued_packets()). > > Reported-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.pe...@gmail.com> > --- > > hw/net/smc91c111.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/net/smc91c111.c b/hw/net/smc91c111.c > index 5774eff..8fc3deb 100644 > --- a/hw/net/smc91c111.c > +++ b/hw/net/smc91c111.c > @@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ static int smc91c111_can_receive(smc91c111_state *s) > if ((s->rcr & RCR_RXEN) == 0 || (s->rcr & RCR_SOFT_RST)) { > return 1; > } > - if (s->allocated == (1 << NUM_PACKETS) - 1) { > + if (s->allocated == (1 << NUM_PACKETS) - 1 || > + s->rx_fifo_len == NUM_PACKETS) { > return 0; > } > return 1; > @@ -182,6 +183,7 @@ static void smc91c111_pop_rx_fifo(smc91c111_state *s) > } else { > s->int_level &= ~INT_RCV; > } > + smc91c111_flush_queued_packets(s); > smc91c111_update(s); > } > > -- > 1.9.1 > >
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>