On 05/20/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
I think there's another issue in the handling of strings.The spec says that valid unescaped chars are in the following range: unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-10FFFF But we do: [IN_DQ_STRING] = { [1 ... 0xFF] = IN_DQ_STRING, ['\\'] = IN_DQ_STRING_ESCAPE, ['"'] = IN_DONE_STRING, }, Shouldn't we cover 0x20 .. 0xFF instead?
If it's the lexer, isn't just it being liberal in what it accepts? paolo