Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 2 December 2015 at 20:20, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> PATCH 1 cleans up unnecessary type punning. >> >> PATCH 2 plugs a massive memory leak in qom-test. I think it would be >> nice to have in 2.5, but at this late stage, it's really up to the >> maintainer. > > To go into 2.5 it needs to be reviewed and either be in a pull > request or have a request from the maintainer for me to apply it > directly by the end of today UK time.
Understood. > Is the memory leak a regression, or have we always leaked and > not noticed? As far as I can see, a minor leak was introduced in commit 5c1904f, but the major leakage comes from commit dc06cbd, both v2.0.
