On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Do, 2016-01-07 at 15:01 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Your patch is simpler and more mature. Maybe it should go in before Gerd's
> > series?
> 
> My series would throw away most of the error handling fixes here, so
> IMHO that would be pointless churn ...
> 
> And I don't think my series is far from being mergeable.  The new patch
> #11 (added in v3) is the most problematic one and possibly requires some
> coordination with xen (depending on how we decide to tackle the
> problems).  But we can split the series up and go ahead merging patches
> 1-10.

That's OK for me.

Reply via email to