On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Do, 2016-01-07 at 15:01 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Your patch is simpler and more mature. Maybe it should go in before Gerd's > > series? > > My series would throw away most of the error handling fixes here, so > IMHO that would be pointless churn ... > > And I don't think my series is far from being mergeable. The new patch > #11 (added in v3) is the most problematic one and possibly requires some > coordination with xen (depending on how we decide to tackle the > problems). But we can split the series up and go ahead merging patches > 1-10.
That's OK for me.