Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> There are three predicates related to MSI-X: >> >> * ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI) is true unless the non-MSI-X >> variant of the device is selected with msi=off. >> >> * msix_present() is true when the device has the PCI capability MSI-X. >> It's initially false, and becomes true during successful realize of >> the MSI-X variant of the device. Thus, it's the same as >> ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI) for realized devices. >> >> * msix_enabled() is true when msix_present() is true and guest software >> has enabled MSI-X. >> >> Code that differs between the non-MSI-X and the MSI-X variant of the >> device needs to be guarded by ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI) or >> by msix_present(), except the latter works only for realized devices. >> >> Code that depends on whether MSI-X is in use needs to be guarded with >> msix_enabled(). >> >> Code review led me to two minor messes: >> >> * ivshmem_vector_notify() calls msix_notify() even when >> !msix_enabled(), unlike most other MSI-X-capable devices. As far as >> I can tell, msix_notify() does nothing when !msix_enabled(). Add >> the guard anyway. >> >> * Most callers of ivshmem_use_msix() guard it with >> ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI). Not necessary, because >> ivshmem_use_msix() does nothing when !msix_present(). That's >> ivshmem's only use of msix_present(), though. Rename >> ivshmem_use_msix() to ivshmem_vector_use(), replace msix_present() >> by ivshmem_has_feature() there, and drop the redundant guards. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> --- >> hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 22 +++++++++------------- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c >> index 7191914..cfea151 100644 >> --- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c >> +++ b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c >> @@ -274,7 +274,9 @@ static void ivshmem_vector_notify(void *opaque) >> >> IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("interrupt on vector %p %d\n", pdev, vector); >> if (ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI)) { >> - msix_notify(pdev, vector); >> + if (msix_enabled(pdev)) { >> + msix_notify(pdev, vector); >> + } >> } else { >> ivshmem_IntrStatus_write(s, 1); >> } >> @@ -712,13 +714,12 @@ static void ivshmem_check_version(void *opaque, const >> uint8_t * buf, int size) >> /* Select the MSI-X vectors used by device. >> * ivshmem maps events to vectors statically, so >> * we just enable all vectors on init and after reset. */ >> -static void ivshmem_use_msix(IVShmemState * s) >> +static void ivshmem_vector_use(IVShmemState *s) >> { >> PCIDevice *d = PCI_DEVICE(s); >> int i; >> >> - IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("%s, msix present: %d\n", __func__, msix_present(d)); >> - if (!msix_present(d)) { >> + if (!ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI)) { >> return; >> } >> >> @@ -733,7 +734,7 @@ static void ivshmem_reset(DeviceState *d) >> >> s->intrstatus = 0; >> s->intrmask = 0; >> - ivshmem_use_msix(s); >> + ivshmem_vector_use(s); >> } >> >> static int ivshmem_setup_interrupts(IVShmemState *s) >> @@ -747,9 +748,9 @@ static int ivshmem_setup_interrupts(IVShmemState *s) >> } >> >> IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("msix initialized (%d vectors)\n", s->vectors); >> - ivshmem_use_msix(s); >> } >> >> + ivshmem_vector_use(s); >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -1034,12 +1035,7 @@ static int ivshmem_pre_load(void *opaque) >> >> static int ivshmem_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) >> { >> - IVShmemState *s = opaque; >> - >> - if (ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI)) { >> - ivshmem_use_msix(s); >> - } >> - >> + ivshmem_vector_use(opaque); >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -1067,11 +1063,11 @@ static int ivshmem_load_old(QEMUFile *f, void >> *opaque, int version_id) >> >> if (ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_MSI)) { >> msix_load(pdev, f); >> - ivshmem_use_msix(s); >> } else { >> s->intrstatus = qemu_get_be32(f); >> s->intrmask = qemu_get_be32(f); >> } >> + ivshmem_vector_use(s); >> > > Sorry I didn't reply to your previous mail (which was slightly > confusing due to wrong naming), yes I think calling it > ivshmem_msix_vectors_use() inside the msix block is better (#2 from > your reply).
I'll give it a try and see how it comes out. > Other than that > > Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> Thanks!