On 03/10/2016 02:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/03/2016 10:41, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/bonzini/qemu/commit/win32-qio-watch^
>> Since I made non-trivial changes to this commit, I thought it was
>> corrrect to remove your S-o-b, to avoid claiming that you'd already
>> signed off on the changes I made. Was that not the right thing
>> todo ?
> 
> You should have then also removed the authorship.  I think in this case
> leaving the author and the s-o-b was the right thing to do, followed by
> removing the authorship and leaving the s-o-b.  Signed-off-by is more of
> a legal thing than a "I think that these changes are good for QEMU".

I've seen this pattern of keeping original authorship and S-o-b, coupled
with an extension to the commit message, in the qemu.git history,
something like:

original title

original message
S-o-b: original
[make the following additional changes]
S-o-b: second author

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to