On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > > With appropriate AMR-like masks. Not actually used by the translation > logic at that point > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > [clg: add the use of spr_register_kvm_hv()] > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@fr.ibm.com> > --- > target-ppc/cpu.h | 1 + > target-ppc/translate_init.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu.h b/target-ppc/cpu.h > index 6952d789e518..81a3e6b5ed29 100644 > --- a/target-ppc/cpu.h > +++ b/target-ppc/cpu.h > @@ -1364,6 +1364,7 @@ static inline int cpu_mmu_index (CPUPPCState *env, bool > ifetch) > #define SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0 (0x03A) > #define SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1 (0x03B) > #define SPR_BOOKE_DEAR (0x03D) > +#define SPR_IAMR (0x03D) > #define SPR_BOOKE_ESR (0x03E) > #define SPR_BOOKE_IVPR (0x03F) > #define SPR_MPC_EIE (0x050) > diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c > index f2eb5f041ecd..2fac6ea58698 100644 > --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c > +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c > @@ -1133,6 +1133,36 @@ static void spr_write_uamor(DisasContext *ctx, int > sprn, int gprn) > tcg_temp_free(t1); > tcg_temp_free(t2); > } > + > +static void spr_write_iamr(DisasContext *ctx, int sprn, int gprn) > +{ > + TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new(); > + TCGv t1 = tcg_temp_new(); > + TCGv t2 = tcg_temp_new(); > + > + /* Note, the HV=1 case is handled earlier by simply using > + * spr_write_generic for HV mode in the SPR table > + */ > + > + /* Build insertion mask into t1 based on context */ > + gen_load_spr(t1, SPR_AMOR); > + > + /* Mask new bits into t2 */ > + tcg_gen_and_tl(t2, t1, cpu_gpr[gprn]); > + > + /* Load AMR and clear new bits in t0 */ > + gen_load_spr(t0, SPR_IAMR); > + tcg_gen_andc_tl(t0, t0, t1); > + > + /* Or'in new bits and write it out */ > + tcg_gen_or_tl(t0, t0, t2); > + gen_store_spr(SPR_IAMR, t0); > + spr_store_dump_spr(SPR_IAMR); > + > + tcg_temp_free(t0); > + tcg_temp_free(t1); > + tcg_temp_free(t2); > +} > #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */ > > static void gen_spr_amr(CPUPPCState *env, bool has_iamr) > @@ -1161,6 +1191,14 @@ static void gen_spr_amr(CPUPPCState *env, bool > has_iamr) > SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS, > &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic, > 0); > + if (!has_iamr) { > + return; > + } > + spr_register_kvm_hv(env, SPR_IAMR, "IAMR", > + SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS, > + &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_iamr, > + &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic, > + KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR, 0);
In case you rework this patch (e.g. by putting the has_iamr parameter from the last patch in here), I think I'd also rather write this as: if (has_iamr) { spr_register_kvm_hv(... } That would be slightly easier to read. Apart from that, the patch looks fine to me. Thomas