On 05/09/2016 03:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/05/2016 10:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29/04/2016 06:23, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Note that the series has a mutually exclusive choice: either
>>> patch 8, or patches 10-11. I still haven't gotten any feedback
>>> on which choice seems nicer.
>>
>> I vote for patch 8.
> 
> Nice first email after 3 weeks, I meant exactly the opposite. :)  Having
> two APIs for the same thing is unnecessary.
> 
> However, including all of patches 8/10/11 may also make sense (and
> leaving out the revert).  Then qjson is migrated first, then its users
> move away from qjson, then qjson is removed.

You'll want to catch up on the rest of the thread - for now, v4 of this
series will drop 8-11 entirely, because Dave was unwilling to accept any
new assertions on the migration path, so we instead moved qjson.c under
migration/ and added explicit comments why it is duplicating a
rudimentary JSON output engine but with no error checking or assertions.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to