Am 09.05.2016 um 20:23 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 08.05.2016 05:35, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 05/07/2016 09:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> While working on NBD, I found myself cursing the qemu-io UI for > >> not letting me test various scenarios, particularly after fixing > >> NBD to serve at byte granularity [1]. And in the process of > >> writing these qemu-io enhancements, I also managed to flush out > >> several other bugs in the block layer proper, with fixes posted > >> separately, such as loss of BDRV_REQ_FUA during write_zeroes [2] > > > > Apologies to reviewers for botching Kevin's email address in my 'git > > send-email' invocation; you may want to double check your To/CC lines > > before hitting send. > > Well, I had even read this heads-up but of course I forgot it by the > time I got to reviewing... > > So let's at least get a > > Series: Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > here with the correct CC.
The only practical problem is that you get some bounced emails. As long as qemu-block is CCed, I'm fine. Kevin
pgpL4b74GKVxN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
