On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:09:47 +0300, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 24/05/16 23:06, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > For correctness, smp_read_barrier_depends() is only required to
> > emit a barrier on Sparc hosts. However, we are currently emitting
> > a consume fence unconditionally.
> >
> > Fix it by keeping the consume fence if we're compiling with Thread
> > Sanitizer, since this might help prevent false warnings. Otherwise,
> > only emit the barrier for Sparc hosts. Note that we still guarantee
> > that smp_read_barrier_depends() is a compiler barrier.
>
> s/Sparc/Alpha/?
Obviously :-) Typo also in patch 3 -- apologies.
E.
